Skip to main content

May 7th: A warning from history

Next Thursday, those of us who feel suuficiently engaged will enter a voting booth and cast our vote. Before we do so, we need to heed the very real warnings which make this election unique in a number of ways.

Barring celestial intervention, we will once again see a coalition government. To consider that eventuality, it is instructive to cast a critical eye over our current ConLib coalition. Has it been a disaster? No, I don't think that would be fair. Had it been a Conservative majority, it might possibly have become a disaster with the scythe through public services veering too far to the right.

We must also remind ourselves that Gordon Brown did his utmost to form a minority coalition but soon conceded defeat. In life, we need a bit of luck and Brown's had long since dried up. History I fear will be rather unkind to Gordon Brown. He promised us prudence and delivered profligacy.

The sales ethos founded across the pond in North America is based on a simple foundation: Under promise and over deliver. Had Brown followed suit, his outcome might have been rather different but the public in the UK or anywhere else is just a big herd of people.

Herd mentaility is as old as the hills. It is the tribalism of herds which fosters political allegiance and, in extreme cases, war. I wonder how many people still vote as their parents once did?

On May 7th 1915, two tribes were at war as Germany sought to take control of Europe and put Great Britain's imperial might in it's place. On that fateful day, a ship left New York for Ireland and before it did so, the German embassy in New York warned that it would be a legitimate target for the torpedo attacks of it's relatively new submarine fleet. Britain and America protested. The Lusitania set sail and was duly torpedoed off Southern Ireland with a loss of life which was immense even by the obscene standards of the Great War.

They were warned and they ignored the warning. The Lusitania was also found to be carrying vast stores of munitions bound for Britain. Hence the warning - the Germans knew they had to sink it or face the consequences of a newly armed opponent. It doesn't make their decision right but it does make it a little easier to try and understand.

When we vote on May 7th, we are effectively choosing a new coalition. Would we like a red one or a blue one? If we want a red one, we take a big step toward breaking up the union. Tribalism is once more threatening our three hundred year old union and a red coalition will give a green light to that tribe.

If we choose a blue coalition, we will at least save the union. We have been warned and now we must be careful what we wish for. Once the Union is breached, it will be gone forever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...