Skip to main content

May 7th: A warning from history

Next Thursday, those of us who feel suuficiently engaged will enter a voting booth and cast our vote. Before we do so, we need to heed the very real warnings which make this election unique in a number of ways.

Barring celestial intervention, we will once again see a coalition government. To consider that eventuality, it is instructive to cast a critical eye over our current ConLib coalition. Has it been a disaster? No, I don't think that would be fair. Had it been a Conservative majority, it might possibly have become a disaster with the scythe through public services veering too far to the right.

We must also remind ourselves that Gordon Brown did his utmost to form a minority coalition but soon conceded defeat. In life, we need a bit of luck and Brown's had long since dried up. History I fear will be rather unkind to Gordon Brown. He promised us prudence and delivered profligacy.

The sales ethos founded across the pond in North America is based on a simple foundation: Under promise and over deliver. Had Brown followed suit, his outcome might have been rather different but the public in the UK or anywhere else is just a big herd of people.

Herd mentaility is as old as the hills. It is the tribalism of herds which fosters political allegiance and, in extreme cases, war. I wonder how many people still vote as their parents once did?

On May 7th 1915, two tribes were at war as Germany sought to take control of Europe and put Great Britain's imperial might in it's place. On that fateful day, a ship left New York for Ireland and before it did so, the German embassy in New York warned that it would be a legitimate target for the torpedo attacks of it's relatively new submarine fleet. Britain and America protested. The Lusitania set sail and was duly torpedoed off Southern Ireland with a loss of life which was immense even by the obscene standards of the Great War.

They were warned and they ignored the warning. The Lusitania was also found to be carrying vast stores of munitions bound for Britain. Hence the warning - the Germans knew they had to sink it or face the consequences of a newly armed opponent. It doesn't make their decision right but it does make it a little easier to try and understand.

When we vote on May 7th, we are effectively choosing a new coalition. Would we like a red one or a blue one? If we want a red one, we take a big step toward breaking up the union. Tribalism is once more threatening our three hundred year old union and a red coalition will give a green light to that tribe.

If we choose a blue coalition, we will at least save the union. We have been warned and now we must be careful what we wish for. Once the Union is breached, it will be gone forever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...