Skip to main content

Your EU voice?

Since David Cameron concluded his negotiations for the UK's current relationship with Europe, it is as though a starting gun has been fired for a race in which tired, out of touch politicians parade like grotesque peacocks in a desperate bid for attention. This is the way of such things in the UK. This is why I'm only surprised that our European colleagues would still want us to remain in Europe given the vanity of our political classes.

So what is the problem here? The problem is painfully simple. There are literally millions of British citizens who have never been deemed worthy of of their say over Europe. It is the views of the latter which would take precedence over the politicians. The behaviour of the politicians merely confirms most of what is ailing British life today. We have a political class who have all the answers and a public whose views are deemed tertiary at best.

After 41 years of being in the club, I think it's fair to assume that the majority of UK citizens have already formed a fairly solid view. Taking an objective view, the Welsh and the Scottish have far more reason to want to stay in than the English. The Celts have done rather better out of Europe than the English. The farming community for a start would have no reason to leave and every reason to stay. Although the farming sector has been decimated by successive UK governments, it remains vibrant and with that, influential.

It certainly gives plenty of fodder for the media who can now feast on this subject for the next four months. Thoughts of the British media inevitably, if regrettably, turn to Rupert Murdoch. Yes, the great irony in all of this is the potential for an ageing Australian to decide the future outcome of Britain;s relationship with Europe. When the votes have been cast and the result is know, will the losing side then quietly recede with good grace and accept the will of the people? Of course not.

In the end, arguments will be driven less by facts and more by jingoism, scare-mongering,  money and xenophobia. Given the dearth of manufacturing in the UK today and the extent to which our economy has become so dependent on the service sector, I would have thought that arguments to leave will have a serious challenge. Then again, the political ambitions of one Australian and one Old Etonian could well put paid to such assumptions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...