Skip to main content

Pentrecelyn and Llanbedr: The antidote to power crazed harassment

Until today's headline on sexual harassment in the workplace published by the TUC, we might have been forgiven for thinking that such behaviour was a thing of the past. Not so.

Harassment of any kind is just another form of the bullying which has destroyed the school years of many a child. That it progresses to being of an overt sexual nature in the adult workplace is a damning indictment of just how far our society needs to go. But as with all such behaviours, it is sadly very difficult for the victim to fight back. Thus, the cycle of inequality is perpetuated. But it is only perpetuated by those who would seek to take advantage thus abusing their positions of "power".

During the recent EU referendum debate, we heard endless arguments relating to workers' rights and the need to stay in the EU with it's more fair approach to employment law. Such arguments though failed to adequately acknowledge the painful truth; more than ever, we find ourselves resident in a predominantly malevolent society. To follow the stereotype, the boss is a bloke and thus has the right to behave in certain ways. He is also paid more although it is often unclear why. Stereotype it may be the the truth remains disturbingly close in this instance.

But is it just the domain of the smaller company with just a handful of employees or is such behaviour still all too familiar in large employers such as the public sector? Before seeking to answer that, it is instructive to consider the findings of the TUC report.

It is astonishing to be writing this in 2016 but more than half of women claim they have been sexually harassed at work. Due to the numerous physical and intangible barriers in front of them, very few choose to take the matter any further. This, of course, plays right in to the hands of the perpetrators. Granted, their very livelihoods are arguably on the line should they choose to complain. But in 2016, it is galling to consider the reality of that.

Nine out of every ten cases reported cite a male culprit. So while women are also capable of such unacceptable behaviour, it sadly remains very much the domain of the male. One in five women who reported such behaviour cited their direct line manager as the offender. Unsurprisingly perhaps, it is mainly the 18 to 24 year old women who are most vulnerable to such practice. Victims in this age group refer to the fear of compromising their employment or their job prospects. As such, many don't even report it and this neanderthal behaviour goes unchallenged.

But abuse of power is not restricted to sexual harassment. Sometimes, when power goes unchallenged for too long, the senior managers begin to lose touch with reality. In Denbighshire this week, another classic story of corporate detachment emerged which once again brought in to focus the stark reality of a local council whose power seems to preclude it from abiding by it's own policies.

When Denbighshire County Council announced it's intention to close the primary school in Pentrecelyn, the affected community reacted with understandable outrage. Pentrecelyn primary school is a category 1 Welsh medium primary school. The plan was to close it and amalgamate it with a nearby primary school with a resultant dilution of Welsh language provision. Putting aside the obvious fact that children from Pentrecelyn are Welsh (by culture and language), this plan went against DCC's own policy. In line with the stated aims of the Welsh Assembly Government, DCC had already signed up to a policy which sought to protect and nurture category 1 Welsh language education. That is why a small army of families, teachers and locals joined forces to take this matter to court. At no surprise to themselves or any other rational person in Denbighshire, the court found in their favour and delivered a damning verdict on DCC's handling of the whole affair.

But sadly, this is not even new in Denbighshire. At nearby Llanbedr, their Church in Wales primary school was similarly threatened. Once again, parents, families and the local community joined forces and took the matter to court. At the time of writing, they are expecting a decision from the Welsh Assembly Government in Cardiff having twice previously won legal cases against DCC. So what is it that is driving this corporate arrogance? It is clear that DCC has an agenda to close these two highly valued community primary schools but it is equally clear from various court cases that their motives are not legitimate. So why do they continue to pursue outcomes which court cases have dismissed?

Harassment takes many forms and although I began this piece by alluding to sexual harassment in the workplace, it is clear that the families and friends in the communities of Llanbedr and Pentrecleyn have also been harassed. So let us turn this all of this on it's head and look at it from the opposite perspective.

Having been put through the unnecessary trauma of court cases several times over and each time been vindicated, have these communities now got a case of their own? Just as the sexually harassed employee ought to be taking her case further to put an end to such behaviour, by the same token the communities of Llanbedr and Pentrecelyn should be pressing for accountability from those who seek to close their vital schools. As with the TUC survey which reports such poor rates of bringing sexual harassment to book, it is arguable that corporations such as DCC have for too long been allowed to operate free of accountability to the very people who pay the council tax which sustains their unacceptable behaviour. The time for change has seldom been more pressing and people deserve much better be they employees in the workplace or close knit village communities.   


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...