Skip to main content

Utopia or fantasy?

One of the most slender majorities achieved in the 2015 general election saw the shadow chancellor Ed Balls beaten by the Tory candidate Andrea Jenkyns. She won the seat with a majority of just 422 votes thus consigning Balls to the political wilderness. This week, Balls took time out from his latest venture as a contestant on "Strictly Come Dancing" to launch a withering attack on Jeremy Corbyn's "Leftist Utopian fantasy".

At best it was a desperate comment from the man whose past record is far from enviable. On losing his seat in 2015, he was reported to have received a "golden goodbye" payment of £88,000. Since then, he has become a Senior Fellowship at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, a visiting Professor of King's College London and Chairman of Norwich City football club. Good work if you get it. Like Corbyn in 2015, Balls had stood as Labour leader in 2010 but where Corbyn succeeded, Balls failed. The political career of Ed Balls will be forever linked with the man who repeatedly promoted him; Gordon Brown. Neither man leaves an enviable legacy. The history books are cruel indeed.

But if we trawl back five hundred years to 1516, we find a book whose legacy continues to fire our collective imaginations. "Utopia" was written by Thomas More and he coined the term from the Greek and it's literal meaning is "no-place". The book described a fictional Atlantic island society and "Utopia" has since come to describe an imagined community or society that possesses highly desirable or near perfect qualities.

So when Ed Balls bemoaned Corbyn's "Leftist Utopian fantasy", he was right in the sense that any Utopia is, by definition, fantasy. That Corbyn's version is deemed Leftist is of little relevance. Since More's 1516 book, there have been socialist, capitalist, monarchical, democratic (whatever that is!), anarchist, ecological, patriarchal and feminist versions to name but a few! It is ironic for a former shadow chancellor to criticise the current Labour for having Utopian ideals. But More was by no means the first to imagine such a concept. Plato's "The Republic" was another famous example and for those of a religious bearing, few could argue with the Garden of Eden. Plato's Republic envisaged a society overseen by philosophers whose collective wisdom would seek to distribute resources fairly to eliminate poverty and deprivation. Given the obvious comparison with Corbyn's vision, it is difficult to understand that the two men come from the same political party. But maybe that is the point. Perhaps Ed Balls represents the ghost of Labour past while Corbyn is the ghost of Labour yet to come?

If Plato's version of Utopia is accepted, it is very difficult to understand how elusive Utopia remains 2,500 years later. A fairer society being run by philosophers would at least spare us "Sir" Philip Green, Donald Trump, Robert Mugabe et al. The newly "elected" Prime Minister Theresa May famously referred to her Conservative party as "the nasty party" in 2002. As it's new leader, she must now make some very big decisions but before she does so, I would refer her to another of those influenced by Thomas More; Abram Maslow.

In 1943, Maslow devised his now famous "Hierarchy of human needs". It is depicted in the diagram below and ranks human needs according to their basic importance. Thus we find air and water at the bottom with self-actualisation at the top.





Maslow's model would most closely fit the vision of Plato's Republic. Instead though, we have a succession of governments pursuing vanity projects such as HS2 while food banks proliferate alarmingly amid record levels of poverty.  For people living in North East Wales who have recently had a bus service collapse, such a luxury as HS2 is a far cry from their daily realities.

Only today, we learn of an NHS trust deciding to delay by 12 months non-essential surgery for smokers and the obese. This confirms what many of us have feared for a long time; namely that the NHS of Bevan is now a thing of the past. It is no longer free at the point of access for every man, woman and child. Presumably, the vision of Bevan would be deemed a "leftist Utopian fantasy" by such luminaries as Ed Balls. But to effect change in our flimsy democracy, MPs first need to get elected. On that basis, Corbyn has a chance of realising his vision. Balls has a chance of winning "Strictly Come Dancing" but I know which one I'd rather see accomplished.

Had local county councillors in Denbighshire based their voting on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs when deciding which cuts to accept in 2014, our county would now be in a much better place. As it is, Utopia seems as far removed from Denbighshire as ever. Our food banks are now seeking larger premises though!


   
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A golden opportunity for Denbigh?

Mini outbursts of discussion continue do their rounds on social media regarding the present state of our town in Denbigh. The temptation to bemoan the status quo is seldom far away as we seek to compare the past with the present. The world around us has changed radically since the second world war and it is often a great challenge for us all to keep abreast of that change. Sixty years ago, it was still fairly normal to see a horse and trap coming to town. Such a sight today would bring the town to a standstill - if indeed there were any shoppers there. The way we communicated sixty years ago was mainly by word of mouth with the written word still being the domain of the pen in our hand. The way we shopped has changed radically too although not always as much as some people think. In those days it was still fairly standard practice for a local shop to deliver their goods to households within a few miles of their premises. In recent years, the ubiquitous supermarkets have been quick

Lessons in Democracy

The quest for democracy is a long road with a seemingly intangible destination. The last week has shown us just how elusive it can be. The Labour Party in the UK continues to struggle with the decision of their electorate to choose Jeremy Corbyn as their leader. Whatever one's political leaning, the behaviour of Labour Party MPs in recent weeks has hardly emboldened the public to engage with the political process. If democracy is the result of asking the people what they want, the recent election of Jeremy Corbyn has provided one of the most overwhelming mandates in history. Such was the public desire for his election, there was no need for a second ballot. We might be forgiven for thinking that even the most arrogant of MPs would have to take such a result on the chin with a modicum of good grace. Not so. Their behaviour in recent weeks has been an insult to the masses who did their bit by engaging with the leadership election during the summer. The legacy of such behaviour is c

Who Cares?

At a time when the fortunes of the NHS continue to dominate the news, I was fortunate this week to attend a medico-legal training day. Rather than bore people with the latest legal positions on various aspects of healthcare, I would instead prefer to concentrate on some of the frankly extraordinary facts which emerged on the day. I found many of them so astonishing, I felt the need to share them with a wider audience for reasons I will explain later. Before I dive in to a statistical frenzy, let me quote the words of the Health Secretary of Tony Blair's first Cabinet in 1997, "The best place for a lawyer is on the operating table.......Lawyers are milking the NHS of millions of pounds every year - money that would be better spent on healthcare". But do we all appreciate the validity of those words? In 1996/7, there were around 4,000 claims for clinical negligence - negligence being the breach of a legal duty of care owed to one person by another which results in damag