Skip to main content

Is Mrs. Penguin at home?

Already, people on both sides of the pond are citing 2016 as a ground-breaking year. Thus far, we can still console ourselves of a few certainties regardless of how the outcomes compared with our own views. For one thing, election polls are just that - a straw poll of opinion. The reason why the EU Referendum poll and the recent American election both seemingly defied the expert pollsters is actually quite simple. The relationship between a member of the public and the ballot box is, rightly, a deeply personal and private affair. They are not (and nor should they be) obliged to divulge their true intention to anyone. It is entirely a matter for themselves and rightly so.

Much has been made of the support for Donald Trump coming from the less educated members of American society. Perhaps so but their votes are worth just as much as anyone else's. In the end, a vote is one person's say and we are all entitled to our say. I have seldom witnessed such an avalanche of self-righteous opprobrium as voters on the losing sides give vent to their spleen. Much of this fails to ackowledge the significant numbers who still choose not to vote. As unpalatable as it may seem to some, that too is their prerogative even if it can seem rather irritating.

Even after four months, the UK is just as immersed in the EU as ever it was. My point being that the wrong question might have been posed in the first place. I don't know who advised David Cameron on the wording of the EU referendum vote but they appear to have raised far more questions than answers. Cameron himself is, of course, well out of it and the poisoned chalice of political life has passed to the woman who did make it to the top; Theresa May.

The irony of May's accession to the top job will be lost on few people. Whereas the wicked witch Hilary Clinton garnered fractionally more of the popular vote than her Republican rival, in the end it was he who gained the requisite number of Electoral College votes; they both knew the rules and that, as they say, is how the cookie crumbles. But still, we must give credit to Mrs. Clinton because 60,122,876 votes is no mean feat -  even if it ultimately failed to secure the big prize. May, by contrast, got to be Prime Minister on the say so of 300-odd Tory MPs. So much easier in the UK than Stateside..

But just how much of an "upset" have these two results really been? Just because a few pollsters called the result before the result came out means nothing. Just because a few political commentators plumped for Remain and Clinton means nothing. In the end, both results were achieved as much by the underachievement of the incumbent as by the performance of the challenger. Politically experienced Clinton may be, but it was evident for a long time that there was huge disappointment when she secured the Democratic nomination. In the end, people are perceived to be part of the problem or part of the solution. I suspect strongly that Clinton's downfall was that to a great many people, she was linked to the very political system with which they had long since tired; Big government which knows best and to hell with the little guy. People will only take so much of that type of approach. There is a limit to which they will put up with being ignored and Clinton et al exceeded that limit. All Trump did (aside from his outrageous language) was to point out that he knew what people were disillusioned with. But on this occasion, that was sufficient because I suspect that large swathes of the American people would have voted for Elmo if he had stood. That said, Trump's ego is so gargantuan, I suspect that he may well lose interest before his four years are up. For people like Donald, it is all about winning and losing. And he won.

But Big Government is problem just about everywhere as vast sums are spent to support the inflated salaries of a political elite whose meaningful engagement with their electorate is all too often cursory. That has been a huge factor in recent results. And it is not just a problem at a national level. Even at a local level, that same attitude continues to rub people up the wrong way. Only today, I read a report by the Welsh National Audit Office informing local councils that they should be doing more to raise money such as increasing the cost of car parking. The report went on to acknowledge that this might prove a problem for a lot of people who might not be able to afford the increases! Who on earth would put their name to such a daft piece of draft guidance and what has it cost to produce?  But it doesn't end there. In their response, the Welsh local government association has said that they don't have the same power to do this as their equivalents in England and Scotland. In other words, they would implement such charges if it was easier for them to do so. No consultation. No member of the public given their say. This is precisely the attitude which just won Trump the US presidency. People are fed up.

As I write, the same political pundits are predicting a snap election in the UK in early 2017. As with Gordon Brown in 2007, I predict the same outcome. I believe Theresa May has waited so long to get her hands on power, she will not risk losing it after such a short tenure. Power of that sort does strange things to people. It is rather like that ring in the "Lord of the Rings". Once worn, the holder is never quite the same again.

But to illustrate what can happen when we expect an outcome in what at face value seems to be a fairly straightforward situation, I share with you a story which always amuses me greatly. There is an excellent biography of the late Vivian Stanshall by Lucian Randall and Chris Welch entitled "Ginger Geezer". Viv, as everyone knew him, was the driving force behind the zany, anarchic band, "The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band". The stories of Viv are endless but this one is a personal favourite.

During a break in touring, Viv was at home indulging himself in his hobby. Viv was an avid collector of aquatic animals and kept several tanks in his home. As with most other aspects of his life, he took it to an absurd level and adopted a custom of donning a full body wet suit resplendent with snorkel and mask when cleaning out the tanks. One day he was leafing his way through the local newspaper when he happened on an advert for a portable power shower and duly filled in the coupon under the name "Mr. Penguin". A few days later, a representative of the shower company rang the door bell on the day when Viv was cleaning out his tanks. The door opened and there stood a strapping ginger haired bloke in a full body wet suit wearing a snorkel and mask. To her eternal credit, the rep looked him up and down and asked, "Is Mrs. Penguin at home?". See what I mean?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A golden opportunity for Denbigh?

Mini outbursts of discussion continue do their rounds on social media regarding the present state of our town in Denbigh. The temptation to bemoan the status quo is seldom far away as we seek to compare the past with the present. The world around us has changed radically since the second world war and it is often a great challenge for us all to keep abreast of that change. Sixty years ago, it was still fairly normal to see a horse and trap coming to town. Such a sight today would bring the town to a standstill - if indeed there were any shoppers there. The way we communicated sixty years ago was mainly by word of mouth with the written word still being the domain of the pen in our hand. The way we shopped has changed radically too although not always as much as some people think. In those days it was still fairly standard practice for a local shop to deliver their goods to households within a few miles of their premises. In recent years, the ubiquitous supermarkets have been quick

Lessons in Democracy

The quest for democracy is a long road with a seemingly intangible destination. The last week has shown us just how elusive it can be. The Labour Party in the UK continues to struggle with the decision of their electorate to choose Jeremy Corbyn as their leader. Whatever one's political leaning, the behaviour of Labour Party MPs in recent weeks has hardly emboldened the public to engage with the political process. If democracy is the result of asking the people what they want, the recent election of Jeremy Corbyn has provided one of the most overwhelming mandates in history. Such was the public desire for his election, there was no need for a second ballot. We might be forgiven for thinking that even the most arrogant of MPs would have to take such a result on the chin with a modicum of good grace. Not so. Their behaviour in recent weeks has been an insult to the masses who did their bit by engaging with the leadership election during the summer. The legacy of such behaviour is c

Who Cares?

At a time when the fortunes of the NHS continue to dominate the news, I was fortunate this week to attend a medico-legal training day. Rather than bore people with the latest legal positions on various aspects of healthcare, I would instead prefer to concentrate on some of the frankly extraordinary facts which emerged on the day. I found many of them so astonishing, I felt the need to share them with a wider audience for reasons I will explain later. Before I dive in to a statistical frenzy, let me quote the words of the Health Secretary of Tony Blair's first Cabinet in 1997, "The best place for a lawyer is on the operating table.......Lawyers are milking the NHS of millions of pounds every year - money that would be better spent on healthcare". But do we all appreciate the validity of those words? In 1996/7, there were around 4,000 claims for clinical negligence - negligence being the breach of a legal duty of care owed to one person by another which results in damag