Skip to main content

Gimme Shelter?

Following the Lunacy Act of 1845, all asylums in Great Britain were required by law to keep a record book of all admissions. This provision in law has since enabled researchers to focus on the main causes for admissions to our asylums in the second half of the nineteenth century.

The main three diagnoses on admission were mania, dementia and melancholia. The latter is now more formally recognised as depression. Mania is still used to describe the same condition as indeed is dementia. When it finally closed it's doors in 1995, the former North Wales Hospital housed a great many patients with known dementia. There were staff in those days who had become expert at dealing with dementia. Granted, not all practices would stand up to scrutiny today but the principle of treating the same condition in one location by dedicated carers was sound.

Dementia is probably one of the diagnoses which we all fear greatly on those occasions when we dare to consider what awaits us in the event of our reaching old age. The loss of memory and awareness is a frightening proposition. Imagine then how frightening that must be for the poor individual with the condition? The provision for such patients was arguably more advanced a century ago than it is today. Only today another news item warned of the growing deficit in dementia care in Wales. This can hardly come as a surprise for the decision makers who have manufactured the current mess. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-27046358

If the way we provide for dementia has taken several steps back since the Victorian era, it is instructive to consider how we address the growing problem of adolescents attempting suicide. On a placement before Christmas, I found myself in a rural part of mid Wales. On more than one occasion, a young person was incarcerated in the local police cell having just attempted to take their own life. Not because the local police cell was considered conducive to any form of moral treatment but because that is all that was available in that part of the world. Quite what the effect of a night in the police cells is on the long term mental health of a young person who has just tried to take their own life is beyond me. It is nothing short of a national disgrace that we continue to treat mental health with such utter contempt when there but for the grace of God go you and I. This and previous governments ought to hang their heads in shame.

Mental health is as normal as breathing and affects us all at different times and in so many different ways. Given the ubiquitous presence of mental health issues in all societies, it is hard to understand a political system which refuses to recognise that simple fact. What is really crazy is the political hierarchy which chooses to ignore one of the easiest problems which they can recognise and address. In the event of them doing so, the rewards will exceed their wildest dreams but I'm not holding my breath just yet.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We are what we eat?

As we continue to drown under a tsunami of over-regulation, I was horrified to read proposals to regulate the food industry like the tobacco industry.  There is a basic problem in this approach. Regulation only has a limited worth. We have seemingly regulated the way in which MPs claim their expenses. We have also aspired to regulate the banks in the wake of the credit crunch which so nearly brought this country to bankruptcy. The regulation of the tobacco industry is a cautionary tale of what happens when the state attempts to interfere with freedom of choice. For all the regulation and increased taxation, the incidence of new smokers taking up the habit has barely changed. The prevalence of people smoking as a proportion of the population has gradually dropped but not by nearly as much as originally intended. It proves that people will make their own minds up and make their own choices accordingly. The best way to effect a change at the end of the pipeline is to concentrate ou...

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Denbighshire: 28 days to stand up for the most vulnerable in our society!

This week, my local council has announced they are seeking the views of the public on how to minimise the impact of the cuts they have already decided. This request for our views has been rather poorly advertised but in spite of that, enough local people have successfully found where to air their views. By sharing that information with their friends and neighbours, the local council will hopefully receive the views of more people than they were perhaps expecting. Where do I start? Living in a modern democracy (as we are assured we do), I would have expected the council to first discuss the available options for cuts with the public through a proper consultation exercise. It is evident they have chosen not to do this. Instead, they have taken it upon themselves to decide who gets their funding taken away and who doesn't. Thus, it seems that our stated views will have little or no effect anyway. The council has already decided and in their eyes that is the end of the matter. The ...