Skip to main content

Gimme Shelter?

Following the Lunacy Act of 1845, all asylums in Great Britain were required by law to keep a record book of all admissions. This provision in law has since enabled researchers to focus on the main causes for admissions to our asylums in the second half of the nineteenth century.

The main three diagnoses on admission were mania, dementia and melancholia. The latter is now more formally recognised as depression. Mania is still used to describe the same condition as indeed is dementia. When it finally closed it's doors in 1995, the former North Wales Hospital housed a great many patients with known dementia. There were staff in those days who had become expert at dealing with dementia. Granted, not all practices would stand up to scrutiny today but the principle of treating the same condition in one location by dedicated carers was sound.

Dementia is probably one of the diagnoses which we all fear greatly on those occasions when we dare to consider what awaits us in the event of our reaching old age. The loss of memory and awareness is a frightening proposition. Imagine then how frightening that must be for the poor individual with the condition? The provision for such patients was arguably more advanced a century ago than it is today. Only today another news item warned of the growing deficit in dementia care in Wales. This can hardly come as a surprise for the decision makers who have manufactured the current mess. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-27046358

If the way we provide for dementia has taken several steps back since the Victorian era, it is instructive to consider how we address the growing problem of adolescents attempting suicide. On a placement before Christmas, I found myself in a rural part of mid Wales. On more than one occasion, a young person was incarcerated in the local police cell having just attempted to take their own life. Not because the local police cell was considered conducive to any form of moral treatment but because that is all that was available in that part of the world. Quite what the effect of a night in the police cells is on the long term mental health of a young person who has just tried to take their own life is beyond me. It is nothing short of a national disgrace that we continue to treat mental health with such utter contempt when there but for the grace of God go you and I. This and previous governments ought to hang their heads in shame.

Mental health is as normal as breathing and affects us all at different times and in so many different ways. Given the ubiquitous presence of mental health issues in all societies, it is hard to understand a political system which refuses to recognise that simple fact. What is really crazy is the political hierarchy which chooses to ignore one of the easiest problems which they can recognise and address. In the event of them doing so, the rewards will exceed their wildest dreams but I'm not holding my breath just yet.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...