Skip to main content

2015: Another bloody coalition!

The forthcoming by election in Rochester and Strood will exert profound influence over the outcome of the 2015 general election. Barring miracles, it seems a racing certainty that Nigel Farage will double his current crop of MPs from 1 to 2. This will be achieved despite the best interests of the Tory high command.

There are still nearly 7 months until polling day next May and already the prospect of another coalition is by far the most likely outcome. The only part of this which remains undecided is which parties will make up the new coalition. It will either be a Tory led coalition or a Labour led coalition and current trends would seem to suggest that Labour is on course to emulate the doomed leadership of Michael Foot in 1983. Then as now, a new party had emerged to threaten to the old guard of Tories and Labour. In 1983, it was the SDP but now it is UKIP. The SDP had emerged from erstwhile Labour MPs disgruntled with the socialist dogma of the Labour party. In 1983, the SDP came within a whisker of forming the Opposition. It took Labour 14 years to regain power after that debacle. The current Liberals led by Nick Clegg are made up of many who would naturally have allied themselves to the SDP. They are people like Vince Cable who are Labour at heart but who find the old style socialism too stifling. How things have changed?

The 1983 general election was won partly because the incumbent Tory government had benefited from the Falklands War and all the usual jingoism which tends to accompany such conflicts. But it was equally lost by a left wing split down the middle which had descended in to a period of squabbling and in-fighting. In some ways, the opposite is now happening to the right wing as the Tories try desperately to avert any more MPs being haemorrhaged to UKIP. Let nobody underestimate the potential of UKIP. Just like the SDP in 1983, their potential is huge. They stand for something which resonates with millions of people. Nigel Farage has also proved himself to be a great tactician and an effective orator. He is also being bank rolled by the considerable wealth of the Yorkshire businessman Paul Sykes. So if the right wing of British politics is undergoing a period of in-fighting, why is the left not cashing in?

The great achievement of Tony Blair was his ability to take the centre ground of British politics. Many of his subsequent decisions will haunt him to his dying day but his real trick was to distance the Labour party from it's socialist roots. That was how he was able to secure three consecutive wins. Miliband needs to learn that lesson and learn it fast.

He has been the most overtly left wing Labour leader since Foot and it will all end in tears for him unless he makes a move for the centre ground. Even now it is probably too late for him to undo the mistakes of his tenure thus far. He has been conspicuous by his lack of ideas and his stock response to most problems is to spend more money and put up taxes - not exactly original or desirable!

So if the new coalition is to be Tory-led, who will their partners be? It is inconceivable to think of a Tory-UKIP alliance unless they can finally agree a coherent strategy on Europe. What is more easy to imagine is a repeat of the current coalition with the Liberals once more making up the difference. With our archaic first past the post electoral system, the Liberals might not lose as many seats as people may imagine. A Tory coalition with the SNP or Plaid Cymru would be impossible against the backdrop of the recent debate on independence.

That just leaves one other realistic coalition. That would be rainbow coalition of all parties minus the Tories and I 'd love to be a fly on the wall at a cabinet meeting featuring Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg, Nigel Farage, Leanne Wood, Nicola Sturgeon, Peter Robinson and Caroline Lucas!

2015 looks set to be the year when the UK voted for more of the same. That would be in keeping with the uneasy relationship of the British with change.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...