Skip to main content

Food Culture

The media storm this week regarding halal chicken on certain well known pizzas is little short of pure comedy. Only last year our newspapers were laying in to our beloved supermarkets over their decision to put horse meat in to several ready meals. Before I address the various religious arguments, I'm compelled to point out the common theme. In each instance, the general public have, of their own volition, purchased the said items. Nobody held a gun to their head - it was a free choice.

Granted, we now live in an age in which everything must be labelled to within an inch of it's life for fear of litigation but that is only one half of the transaction. Caveat emptor: Let the buyer beware! It is incumbent on all of us to spend our money in haste and repent at leisure. The counter argument has it that fore armed is fore warned. That is all well and good but with the quite staggering amount of choice to the consumer in today's world, we sometimes tend to forget that we can still question things if they actually mean that much to us.

Which brings me on to the religious arguments. Shock horror! We have been duped in to eating food especially prepared for the Muslim population. Absolute rubbish! The ready meal "scandal" was one of those stories which has just waiting to happen. Did nobody step back and wonder how the supermarkets had been generating such vast profits for so long? Did nobody stop to question the integrity of the food manufacturers whose profit margins were gradually being eroded by the greedy supermarkets?

A debate briefly surfaced a couple of weeks ago in which our Prime Minister insisted that we remain a Christian country. Since then, no less a figure than the Archbishop of Canterbury has added his voice to that of Mr. Cameron. As a church goer myself, I can only say that if this country is really still Christian, it manages to hide it admirably. That said, the Queen is still head of State and head of the church - the two long since having become quite unrelated. Can anyone claim that the UK is of this faith or that faith? That might have been possible before the wars but since then, we have embarked on a route of nihilism and hedonism.

Perhaps the real issue here is one of good old fashioned hypocrisy. It seems as though the uncompromising demands of faiths such as Islam are a little hard for us to accept. Perhaps if we followed suit and followed the faith which many of us continue to espouse (based on all recent census data), this would not even be an issue.

As far as I can recall though, the Christian tradition has seldom been a big consumer of meat anyway. Shrove Tuesday was the day when leftover bits of meat were consumed in a pancake with sweet things also being finished ahead of the fast of Lent. Meat was not consumed (Halal or otherwise) during Lent. Even when Good Friday arrived, Christians would eat fish, not meat. Jesus famously fed the five thousand with fish and loaves - no meat involved.

It's a great "story" for the Daily Mail and Nigel Farage but I'm not sure it's a story at all. Instead of going to a famous chain of restaurants to buy an over priced pizza, why not be radical and stay at home but make your own. That way, it will cost you a lot less with the added bonus that you will be master of what goes in it. The other day, we entertained a group of children aged between 6 and 9. Together, we made the pizza bases and the children made their own pizzas from base ingredients. We knew where every ingredient was from because we don't shop at the big supermarkets. Ergo, we didn't have to worry about any of the ingredients because we were able to buy them from small local independent retailers. For fear of sounding overly smug, it was a very satisfying experience. I don't know if my local butcher would know how to spell the word "halal", let alone define it. But he could tell me the name of the local farm whence our food came. You pay your money and you take your choice...

In 1943, Maslow espoused his now famous "hierarchy of needs". In it, he portrayed our human needs in a pyramid with the base representing our basic needs. These include breathing, food, water, sex, sleep, homeostasis and excretion. Nowhere does he specify our need to differentiate between our food and how it was prepared. If we are stranded in the desert on the verge of starvation, it's fair to say we will eat whatever we can find. Nothing has changed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A golden opportunity for Denbigh?

Mini outbursts of discussion continue do their rounds on social media regarding the present state of our town in Denbigh. The temptation to bemoan the status quo is seldom far away as we seek to compare the past with the present. The world around us has changed radically since the second world war and it is often a great challenge for us all to keep abreast of that change. Sixty years ago, it was still fairly normal to see a horse and trap coming to town. Such a sight today would bring the town to a standstill - if indeed there were any shoppers there. The way we communicated sixty years ago was mainly by word of mouth with the written word still being the domain of the pen in our hand. The way we shopped has changed radically too although not always as much as some people think. In those days it was still fairly standard practice for a local shop to deliver their goods to households within a few miles of their premises. In recent years, the ubiquitous supermarkets have been quick

Lessons in Democracy

The quest for democracy is a long road with a seemingly intangible destination. The last week has shown us just how elusive it can be. The Labour Party in the UK continues to struggle with the decision of their electorate to choose Jeremy Corbyn as their leader. Whatever one's political leaning, the behaviour of Labour Party MPs in recent weeks has hardly emboldened the public to engage with the political process. If democracy is the result of asking the people what they want, the recent election of Jeremy Corbyn has provided one of the most overwhelming mandates in history. Such was the public desire for his election, there was no need for a second ballot. We might be forgiven for thinking that even the most arrogant of MPs would have to take such a result on the chin with a modicum of good grace. Not so. Their behaviour in recent weeks has been an insult to the masses who did their bit by engaging with the leadership election during the summer. The legacy of such behaviour is c

Who Cares?

At a time when the fortunes of the NHS continue to dominate the news, I was fortunate this week to attend a medico-legal training day. Rather than bore people with the latest legal positions on various aspects of healthcare, I would instead prefer to concentrate on some of the frankly extraordinary facts which emerged on the day. I found many of them so astonishing, I felt the need to share them with a wider audience for reasons I will explain later. Before I dive in to a statistical frenzy, let me quote the words of the Health Secretary of Tony Blair's first Cabinet in 1997, "The best place for a lawyer is on the operating table.......Lawyers are milking the NHS of millions of pounds every year - money that would be better spent on healthcare". But do we all appreciate the validity of those words? In 1996/7, there were around 4,000 claims for clinical negligence - negligence being the breach of a legal duty of care owed to one person by another which results in damag