Skip to main content

Scotland Matters After All!

The decision of the three leaders of the main political parties in Westminster to venture North of the Border today was rather more than closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. At best, the timing of their visit was rather less than genuine. At worst, it displayed the very arrogance which has brought Scotland to the brink of independence.
Each of the Westminster elite had their own hidden agenda for going up North today. For Cameron, he at least had to be seen to be trying to save the Union although there are many who suspect that a Yes vote will secretly please him since this will make long term Tory rule in Westminster a very real proposition. Of the three stooges who went to Scotland today, it is paradoxically Cameron who stands to lose the least since the Tories only have one MP in Scotland anyway – and that was achieved contrary to expectation.
As usual, Clegg watched the actions of the other two and sought to align himself. His stock might have risen had he displayed the courage to remain in Westminster. He would have appeared more genuine while making the other two appear more desperate. Although the Liberals have a long tradition of Scottish MPs, they are rather fewer in number than a century ago. A Yes vote will have little impact on the Liberals in Westminster one way or the other. This brings us to Miliband.
Without question, he is the one for whom a Yes vote would spell disaster. For mainly partisan reasons, Labour continues to boast significant numbers of MPs in Scotland. A Yes vote will make a Labour majority in Westminster very difficult if not impossible. Just as the Tories are despised and mistrusted in Scotland, Labour has left a very bad taste in the mouth after the Blair/Brown debacle South of the border.
It is clear to me (as it has been for months now) that a Yes vote is now a done deal. The key to situations such as this one is momentum. We witnessed the same phenomenon in Wales in 1997. The No vote led the way all the way until the final furlong but it is only the finishing line that counts and like an outsider in the Grand National, the Welsh voted for devolution against all odds. Compared to the current polls in Scotland, the Welsh vote was even less convincing.
I don’t believe the presence of the Westminster clones made a jot of difference today. The result is already in the bag and for the vast majority, minds have been made up. It is difficult to gauge the extent to which Cameron might have given yet more impetus to the Yes vote but he will have done nothing for the No vote.
When the dust has settled and the enormity of the result begins to sink in, the Scots will be faced with the mother of all hangovers the morning after. Put simply, a Yes vote will be messy for everyone. From a constitutional standpoint, it will be a nightmare on many levels. Organising their own currency will also be a considerable challenge. Respective relationships with the EU will differ hugely as the Scots seek greater integration while the rest of us negotiate our way out. 
Two men in particular must have been grinning like Cheshire cats today. Obviously, Alex Salmond has had one of those days which politicians can only dream of. Just do nothing and let your opponents do the hard work for you. Nigel Farage by contrast has been able to knuckle down to theimportant job of ensuring a UKIP win in the forthcoming by-election in Clacton. Out of such acorns do oak trees grow and Farage will be acutely aware of the importance of getting a first Westminster seat for UKIP while giving the Cameron a bloody nose to boot.
Much has been written about the Welsh and Ulster in the context of the independence debate but Scotland has something they don't have - oil. That is the main reason why the Scots have the capacity to go it alone and why the Welsh and Ulster don't. Although it might well be a tough few years for an independent Scotland, they at least have a good long term chance of survival provided they have the foresight to look North and learn from the Norwegians. The latter have exerted high taxes while providing excellent care for their children and their elderly. They have also resisted the temptation to squander the proceeds of their oil. In the process, they have created the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. This means that even if their oil dried up tomorrow, Norway could live off the interest on their accumulated wealth. I wonder if Alex Salmond has similar plans? If he has, the future of Scotland as an independent state looks rosy indeed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...
Post a Comment
Read more

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...
Post a Comment
Read more