Skip to main content

Scotland Matters After All!

The decision of the three leaders of the main political parties in Westminster to venture North of the Border today was rather more than closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. At best, the timing of their visit was rather less than genuine. At worst, it displayed the very arrogance which has brought Scotland to the brink of independence.
Each of the Westminster elite had their own hidden agenda for going up North today. For Cameron, he at least had to be seen to be trying to save the Union although there are many who suspect that a Yes vote will secretly please him since this will make long term Tory rule in Westminster a very real proposition. Of the three stooges who went to Scotland today, it is paradoxically Cameron who stands to lose the least since the Tories only have one MP in Scotland anyway – and that was achieved contrary to expectation.
As usual, Clegg watched the actions of the other two and sought to align himself. His stock might have risen had he displayed the courage to remain in Westminster. He would have appeared more genuine while making the other two appear more desperate. Although the Liberals have a long tradition of Scottish MPs, they are rather fewer in number than a century ago. A Yes vote will have little impact on the Liberals in Westminster one way or the other. This brings us to Miliband.
Without question, he is the one for whom a Yes vote would spell disaster. For mainly partisan reasons, Labour continues to boast significant numbers of MPs in Scotland. A Yes vote will make a Labour majority in Westminster very difficult if not impossible. Just as the Tories are despised and mistrusted in Scotland, Labour has left a very bad taste in the mouth after the Blair/Brown debacle South of the border.
It is clear to me (as it has been for months now) that a Yes vote is now a done deal. The key to situations such as this one is momentum. We witnessed the same phenomenon in Wales in 1997. The No vote led the way all the way until the final furlong but it is only the finishing line that counts and like an outsider in the Grand National, the Welsh voted for devolution against all odds. Compared to the current polls in Scotland, the Welsh vote was even less convincing.
I don’t believe the presence of the Westminster clones made a jot of difference today. The result is already in the bag and for the vast majority, minds have been made up. It is difficult to gauge the extent to which Cameron might have given yet more impetus to the Yes vote but he will have done nothing for the No vote.
When the dust has settled and the enormity of the result begins to sink in, the Scots will be faced with the mother of all hangovers the morning after. Put simply, a Yes vote will be messy for everyone. From a constitutional standpoint, it will be a nightmare on many levels. Organising their own currency will also be a considerable challenge. Respective relationships with the EU will differ hugely as the Scots seek greater integration while the rest of us negotiate our way out. 
Two men in particular must have been grinning like Cheshire cats today. Obviously, Alex Salmond has had one of those days which politicians can only dream of. Just do nothing and let your opponents do the hard work for you. Nigel Farage by contrast has been able to knuckle down to theimportant job of ensuring a UKIP win in the forthcoming by-election in Clacton. Out of such acorns do oak trees grow and Farage will be acutely aware of the importance of getting a first Westminster seat for UKIP while giving the Cameron a bloody nose to boot.
Much has been written about the Welsh and Ulster in the context of the independence debate but Scotland has something they don't have - oil. That is the main reason why the Scots have the capacity to go it alone and why the Welsh and Ulster don't. Although it might well be a tough few years for an independent Scotland, they at least have a good long term chance of survival provided they have the foresight to look North and learn from the Norwegians. The latter have exerted high taxes while providing excellent care for their children and their elderly. They have also resisted the temptation to squander the proceeds of their oil. In the process, they have created the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. This means that even if their oil dried up tomorrow, Norway could live off the interest on their accumulated wealth. I wonder if Alex Salmond has similar plans? If he has, the future of Scotland as an independent state looks rosy indeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...