Skip to main content

The Bristol Approach: An appreciation

I have written previously about the remarkable achievements of Pat Pilkington but did not allude to the Bristol Programme Approach first advocated by the late Penny Brohn who stands as an indefatigable giant in the world of secondary cancer.

 http://betweendenbighandkeele.blogspot.com/2013/09/gulliver-among-lilliputians.html

Penny was on the wrong end of secondary cancer herself and soon devised a programme which ought to be replicated in every corner of the country (and far beyond for that matter). Very briefly, Penny proposed a four point plan for people with cancer or recurrent cancer. Along the way, she was vilified by the medical establishment but finally received the apology she deserved. This is her four point plan. On the record, I believe strongly it should be widely available in the public domain where it undoubtedly belongs:-


  • The approach should be holistic. There should be a place where therapists show as much interest in the heads and hearts of patients as in their livers and lymph glands.
  • People have a right to take responsibility for their own health and should be empowered to do so, promoting their own self healing.
  • Lifestyle changes may prevent cancer occuring or re-occuring, and this message to patients is vital, as is help in making such changes.
  • Safe and gentle therapies could be used to counteract disease and enhance health, alongside conventional medicines seemingly more aggressive approach.
I accept that the vast majority of the medical profession continue to dispute this as nonsense. These views reflect my own and I believe the time has come for a grown up debate in this area because I think people are worth it. I would point to the use of the word "may" in the third point as I would not want to deliver false hope. There is nothing in Penny's approach other than common sense and holistic care. I hope one day to see centres like hers throughout the country. Whether patients choose to access them is rightly a matter for them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...
Post a Comment
Read more

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...
Post a Comment
Read more