Skip to main content

Social Enterprise: Altruistic Employment

When was the last time you heard the words "Social enterprise"? Unless you have cut yourself off from mankind for the last few years, it is likely that you will have heard people mentioning social enterprise either in the media or simply by word of mouth. But what exactly is it and what's the big deal?

The simple truth is that social enterprise is actually as old as the hills. In very simple terms, social enterprise businesses have a social mission at the core of their aims ahead of any potential profit. They can be "not-for-profit" or they can be a "for-profit" organisation. In recent years there has been an explosion in the growth of social enterprise and it is difficult to see any reversal of that trend. Put simply, if there was no need for them, they would not exist.

To demonstrate my point, I will focus on three social enterprise projects from around the world because this business concept is indeed global. In an attempt to try and give a flavour of the diverse ways in which such projects operate, I have chosen three from across the globe.

I begin with an innovative American company started by students at Stanford University. Adam Kircher had been working in the immediate aftermath of the tsunami in Indonesia when he recognised the logistical challenges of redistributing supplies to the those in the greatest need. In particular, he became interested in the availablity of medicines. On his return to the United States, he was confronted by a bleak reality. Every year in the US, £5 billion worth of medicines go to waste and yet 50 million Americans can't afford to take the medicines they are prescribed. This is thought to result in 125,000 annual deaths costing the US £289 billion annually. The waste of this mountain of medication also has negative impacts on water and air pollution. SIRUM was established to tackle this obvious inequity. Safe clinics were set up nationally across 40 US states. It's early days, but this not-for-profit oirganisation has so far helped 20,000 citizens and redistributed an estimated £3 million of medicines (over 1 million pills!). There are a great many countries around the globe who do not enjoy the benefits of the NHS as we do in the UK which infers that this smart idea could have a significant knock on effect globally. Reducing waste is one of the fundamental obligations of this and every subsequent generation.

My next company is based in the Netherlands. WakaWaka produces solar lighting and profits from the sales are used to provide a solar light to a family living without access to electricity. To fully appreciate the implications of such a simple thing, just turn off every electrical appliance in your home for a week and see what you think. By using crowd-sourcing, they raised an initial capital fund of $48,000, WakaWaka have so far sent thousands of these life changing devices to areas affected by earthquakes and health emergencies such as Sierra Leone, Haiti, Nepal, the Philippines and Syria. This is an example of a "buy-one, give-one" model. It is a simple idea with a profound impact on so many people less fortunate than ourselves.

But while the first two examples have achieved their impact nationally and internationally, my third example is a little closer to home and makes a real impact in the locality where I live. Two sisters in Denbigh, Nerys and Mair, set up Vintage Mary Dei following their own experiences caring for their mother and father who had suffered from vascular dementia and disability respectively for many years. This enterprise has special meaning for me because I had been the sole carer for my first wife before her death from breast cancer. It is when we find ourselves in these unfamiliar positions that we begin to appreciate the scale of such challenges. Like Nerys and Mair, I found little support around me at a time when I scarcely needed it more. Without support, caring full time can be an isolating and lonely business. Vintage May Dei runs a clothes shop stocked on the goodwill of voluntary donations with the proceeds going to fund their activity in assisting the needs of carers in the local area. In the UK, carers nationally save our much maligned health service billions with little or no recognition or support. The work of Vintage Mary Dei is inspiring and reminds us of the power of social enterprise even on a comparatively local level. At a time when Wales has just seen the introduction of the Social Services and Well Being Act (2014), it is great to see a social enterprise where I live showing how it should be done - even before the Act was introduced!

So are social enterprises such as the ones here a passing fad or are they here to stay? There is no question that they are here to stay - and a good thing to. They are a fine example of what can be achieved with a clear vision to improve the lives of others. They are as close to true altruism as there is in our society today. In many ways, they are the modern day evolution of Victorian institutions such as the co-operative society in the UK and the philanthropic movement of the US in the twentieth century.In the UK, 38% of all social enterprises work in the most deprived 20% of communities. In other words, the more deprived the community, the more likely you will find a social enterprise in the UK. It is fair to say that social enterprises have increasingly replaced the role of public sector in the UK as the economic balance has been tilted in a more austere direction. Even if that balance is redressed with a radical change of government in 2020, I don't doubt the vital contribution of social enterprise and see no signs of it slowing down. Social enterprise is a more altruistic way of doing things with people rather shareholders being the principle focus. This is why the days ahead for social enterprise are rosy - even if the road to achievement can often be a rocky one.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...