Skip to main content

Would you agree Mr. Stubbs?

Britain in 1975 was significantly different to the Britain of today and for a variety of reasons. The social fabric for one thing was lacking if not bereft of what we now call political correctness. History will judge whether that was a good thing or not.

Very briefly, it is instructive to reflect on the outcome of the EU referendum of 1975. 67.23% of those who voted elected to remain. In our 2016 version, that figure had dropped to 48%. It is also interesting to note that at a time when the electorate was generally considered to be more engaged, the turnout in 1975 was 64.6% compared to 72.2% two weeks ago. Then as now the incumbent government negotiated a deal and recommended continued membership. The respective outcomes could scarcely have been more different. But enough of the EU for now.

1975 was a very important year for British culture. I say this for no other reason than the emergence of a new situation comedy whose first six episodes were aired by the BBC. Written by husband and wife team John Cleese and Connie Booth, Fawlty Towers became the benchmark against which all British television comedy would ultimately be measured. That it stands up so well forty years later is testament to the rare brilliance of the writing and the small group of actors who brought the characters to life. The subtext was straightforward; a small hotel being run on the English Riviera by an outrageous social climber (Basil Fawlty) who enjoyed a tempestuous relationship with his long suffering wife (Sybil Fawlty). Each had a different view of how the hotel should be run with calamitous consequences. Some of the episodes are now so politically incorrect, they are no longer even shown. In a way, this reminds us how much Britain has changed since 1975.

In the first series shown in the autumn of 1975, the second episode was entitled "The Builders". In this episode, Sybil had requested that the reliable local builder Mr. Stubbs be brought in to close off the drawing room door while making a new door to access the kitchen. Basil though had other ideas and instead engaged the infinitely less reliable Mr. O'Reilly who continues to enjoy the wrath of Sybil following previous unpleasant experiences of his endeavours (Note how the Irishman is portrayed as idle and incompetent and the Englishman is seen as reliable and professional). True to form, Mr. Murphy makes a complete bodge of the job and Sybil duly returns from her golf trip to see for herself. Furious, she calls Mr. Stubbs herself and asks him to come over the next day to rectify the situation. Not to be shamed though, Basil quickly re-engages Mr. O'Reilly to make amends for his shoddy work - which he does. Sybil returns the next day to find Mr. Stubbs waiting to see what work needs doing. Basil takes great glee in assuring her that everything has been completed and Mr. Stubbs won't be needed. Obviously embarrassed, Sybil asks Mr. Stubbs what he thinks of the work. His initial response is one of quiet admiration until he asks what sort of lintel has been used above the new kitchen door situated beneath a supporting wall. Basil replies "four by two" and Mr. Stubbs is horrified. He immediately sets about making the wall safe and Basil faces the final humiliation by leaving the hotel with a garden gnome under his arm in search of Mr. O'Reilly. He is overheard saying that he intends to insert the gnome in to Mr O'Reilly when he finds him. Indeed.

So why allude to this gem of 1970s situation comedy? Well, having observed our political antics in recent days, I have seen the characters of Basil Fawlty and Mr. O' Reilly on prominent display in public life. Fawlty is ultimately found out for what he is and is left embarrassed and humiliated (David Cameron). Mr. O'Reilly confirms the worst suspicions of the sage-like Sybil and once again flatters to deceive after yet more gifted opportunities (Boris Johnson). Of course, it is well known that both David and Boris both attended Eton College in Berkshire. This has not been a good week for Eton. Like most people, I never attended Eton (although in 1991 I did live within a stone's throw of it). But if we ever wanted a feel of how Eton educates it's star pupils, we have plenty of examples in recent years.

At Prime Minister's questions earlier this year, Jeremy Corbyn asked Mr. Cameron, "Will the chair of the Oxfordshire anti-austerity campaign (Cameron's own mother) be writing a letter to himself?" (in reference to Cameron's own local health service). From the man who had espoused an end to "Punch and Judy politics", Cameron replied with a very telling line, "I know what my mother would say, I think she'd look across the Dispatch Box say, "put on a proper suit, do up your tie and sing the National Anthem". Following his own fall from grace in the aftermath of the EU referendum, Cameron called for Jeremy Corbyn to stand down in the National interest saying, "For Heaven's sake man, go!". Those two retorts from Cameron arguably provide us with an accurate picture of what matters at Eton College. Matters such as the health service, austerity and democracy evidently come a distant second to how one is attired.

But back to that memorable episode of Fawlty Towers. It culminated with the dependable Mr. Stubbs stepping in to save the day and rectify a disastrous situation. Given the EU referendum result and the decision of Boris Johnson (Mr O'Reilly) to slope off in to the sunset having been royally shafted by his erstwhile chum Michael Gove (Faust), it is instructive to consider how the UK will now address the small matter of leaving the EU. As it stands, the Prime Minister who gambled with the promise of a referendum in exchange for five precious years of power has, to coin the vernacular, left the building. In other words, in a fit of pique at having been usurped by the British public, he has decided he doesn't want to play anymore. Hardly the hallmark of the playing fields of Eton surely?

So in a week in which the impossible became possible with the passing of every minute, the contenders to replace him to be the Mr. Stubbs of the moment are worthy of consideration. Teresa May has been Home Secretary for six years now. Despite that, she was nowhere to be seen during the recent campaigning for the EU referendum. It was almost as though she was biding her time. Beware of an old man (or lady) in a hurry. Her husband is also a major player in G4S, the company who make lots of money and get awarded lots of government contracts. But at least she is not yet known to have offshore funds in the Cayman Islands. Not yet. Next in line to pick up the most poisoned chalice in world politics is the mild mannered Michael Gove who is to teachers what Jeremy Hunt is to doctors. Notwithstanding his public assassination of his great friend Boris Johnson (Mr O'Reilly), he has also repeatedly referred to his inability to do the job. A strange choice then by another closet megalomaniac. It is sobering to consider that Gove is reckoned to be the intellectual heavyweight in the contest. Next comes Dr. Liam Fox, the former Defense Secretary who was forced to resign for abuse of office. He had previously been guilty of the largest expenses fraud and forced to repay the fraudulent claim. A former GP, Dr. Fox is considered a darling of the Right and the Leave campaign. That leaves just two. The first is Stephen Crabbe who has enjoyed a meteoric rise to Cabinet from a council house upbringing in South Wales. Along the way, he has claimed a cure for homosexuality. Crabbe offers himself as the candidate of unity. And last but not least comes the other lady, Andrea Leadsom.

Laregly unknown until her impressive role in a TV debate on behalf of the Leave campaign, Leadsom has skeletons aplenty in her closet. She started a buy-to-let property company with her husband in 2003 and ploughed her shares in to trusts for her children. This is a well trodden path to avoid paying inheritance tax. Staff salaries at her Westminster office had been paid by a sizeable donation from her brother's company based in Guernsey via a holding company in the British Virgin Islands. That same company also made donations of £816,000 to the Conservative Party.

So if there is to be a reliable, dependable Mr. Stubbs to rectify the current dangers of the Leave result, the five Tory candidates do not inspire much confidence. It may well be that the Mr. Stubbs needed to address this monumental issue is nearer than the Tories think. It might be the badly dressed man standing opposite the Dispatch Box who refrains from personal insults from outside or within his own party. He might not have a cure for homosexuality or holding companies in the British Virgin Islands or a past history of enforced resignation due to expenses abuses or a spouse with a vested interest in a major beneficiary of G4S or the ability to sink a knife in to back of any potential rival, but he is focused, honest and behaves with a dignity sadly lacking in his party and the one opposite. Can I candidly suggest that if the UK is to come out of Europe in a sensible, respectful manner, we need a general election forthwith to bring our own Mr. Stubbs to the fore sooner rather than later?

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A golden opportunity for Denbigh?

Mini outbursts of discussion continue do their rounds on social media regarding the present state of our town in Denbigh. The temptation to bemoan the status quo is seldom far away as we seek to compare the past with the present. The world around us has changed radically since the second world war and it is often a great challenge for us all to keep abreast of that change. Sixty years ago, it was still fairly normal to see a horse and trap coming to town. Such a sight today would bring the town to a standstill - if indeed there were any shoppers there. The way we communicated sixty years ago was mainly by word of mouth with the written word still being the domain of the pen in our hand. The way we shopped has changed radically too although not always as much as some people think. In those days it was still fairly standard practice for a local shop to deliver their goods to households within a few miles of their premises. In recent years, the ubiquitous supermarkets have been quick

Lessons in Democracy

The quest for democracy is a long road with a seemingly intangible destination. The last week has shown us just how elusive it can be. The Labour Party in the UK continues to struggle with the decision of their electorate to choose Jeremy Corbyn as their leader. Whatever one's political leaning, the behaviour of Labour Party MPs in recent weeks has hardly emboldened the public to engage with the political process. If democracy is the result of asking the people what they want, the recent election of Jeremy Corbyn has provided one of the most overwhelming mandates in history. Such was the public desire for his election, there was no need for a second ballot. We might be forgiven for thinking that even the most arrogant of MPs would have to take such a result on the chin with a modicum of good grace. Not so. Their behaviour in recent weeks has been an insult to the masses who did their bit by engaging with the leadership election during the summer. The legacy of such behaviour is c

Who Cares?

At a time when the fortunes of the NHS continue to dominate the news, I was fortunate this week to attend a medico-legal training day. Rather than bore people with the latest legal positions on various aspects of healthcare, I would instead prefer to concentrate on some of the frankly extraordinary facts which emerged on the day. I found many of them so astonishing, I felt the need to share them with a wider audience for reasons I will explain later. Before I dive in to a statistical frenzy, let me quote the words of the Health Secretary of Tony Blair's first Cabinet in 1997, "The best place for a lawyer is on the operating table.......Lawyers are milking the NHS of millions of pounds every year - money that would be better spent on healthcare". But do we all appreciate the validity of those words? In 1996/7, there were around 4,000 claims for clinical negligence - negligence being the breach of a legal duty of care owed to one person by another which results in damag