Skip to main content

Food Culture

The media storm this week regarding halal chicken on certain well known pizzas is little short of pure comedy. Only last year our newspapers were laying in to our beloved supermarkets over their decision to put horse meat in to several ready meals. Before I address the various religious arguments, I'm compelled to point out the common theme. In each instance, the general public have, of their own volition, purchased the said items. Nobody held a gun to their head - it was a free choice.

Granted, we now live in an age in which everything must be labelled to within an inch of it's life for fear of litigation but that is only one half of the transaction. Caveat emptor: Let the buyer beware! It is incumbent on all of us to spend our money in haste and repent at leisure. The counter argument has it that fore armed is fore warned. That is all well and good but with the quite staggering amount of choice to the consumer in today's world, we sometimes tend to forget that we can still question things if they actually mean that much to us.

Which brings me on to the religious arguments. Shock horror! We have been duped in to eating food especially prepared for the Muslim population. Absolute rubbish! The ready meal "scandal" was one of those stories which has just waiting to happen. Did nobody step back and wonder how the supermarkets had been generating such vast profits for so long? Did nobody stop to question the integrity of the food manufacturers whose profit margins were gradually being eroded by the greedy supermarkets?

A debate briefly surfaced a couple of weeks ago in which our Prime Minister insisted that we remain a Christian country. Since then, no less a figure than the Archbishop of Canterbury has added his voice to that of Mr. Cameron. As a church goer myself, I can only say that if this country is really still Christian, it manages to hide it admirably. That said, the Queen is still head of State and head of the church - the two long since having become quite unrelated. Can anyone claim that the UK is of this faith or that faith? That might have been possible before the wars but since then, we have embarked on a route of nihilism and hedonism.

Perhaps the real issue here is one of good old fashioned hypocrisy. It seems as though the uncompromising demands of faiths such as Islam are a little hard for us to accept. Perhaps if we followed suit and followed the faith which many of us continue to espouse (based on all recent census data), this would not even be an issue.

As far as I can recall though, the Christian tradition has seldom been a big consumer of meat anyway. Shrove Tuesday was the day when leftover bits of meat were consumed in a pancake with sweet things also being finished ahead of the fast of Lent. Meat was not consumed (Halal or otherwise) during Lent. Even when Good Friday arrived, Christians would eat fish, not meat. Jesus famously fed the five thousand with fish and loaves - no meat involved.

It's a great "story" for the Daily Mail and Nigel Farage but I'm not sure it's a story at all. Instead of going to a famous chain of restaurants to buy an over priced pizza, why not be radical and stay at home but make your own. That way, it will cost you a lot less with the added bonus that you will be master of what goes in it. The other day, we entertained a group of children aged between 6 and 9. Together, we made the pizza bases and the children made their own pizzas from base ingredients. We knew where every ingredient was from because we don't shop at the big supermarkets. Ergo, we didn't have to worry about any of the ingredients because we were able to buy them from small local independent retailers. For fear of sounding overly smug, it was a very satisfying experience. I don't know if my local butcher would know how to spell the word "halal", let alone define it. But he could tell me the name of the local farm whence our food came. You pay your money and you take your choice...

In 1943, Maslow espoused his now famous "hierarchy of needs". In it, he portrayed our human needs in a pyramid with the base representing our basic needs. These include breathing, food, water, sex, sleep, homeostasis and excretion. Nowhere does he specify our need to differentiate between our food and how it was prepared. If we are stranded in the desert on the verge of starvation, it's fair to say we will eat whatever we can find. Nothing has changed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...