Skip to main content

Food Culture

The media storm this week regarding halal chicken on certain well known pizzas is little short of pure comedy. Only last year our newspapers were laying in to our beloved supermarkets over their decision to put horse meat in to several ready meals. Before I address the various religious arguments, I'm compelled to point out the common theme. In each instance, the general public have, of their own volition, purchased the said items. Nobody held a gun to their head - it was a free choice.

Granted, we now live in an age in which everything must be labelled to within an inch of it's life for fear of litigation but that is only one half of the transaction. Caveat emptor: Let the buyer beware! It is incumbent on all of us to spend our money in haste and repent at leisure. The counter argument has it that fore armed is fore warned. That is all well and good but with the quite staggering amount of choice to the consumer in today's world, we sometimes tend to forget that we can still question things if they actually mean that much to us.

Which brings me on to the religious arguments. Shock horror! We have been duped in to eating food especially prepared for the Muslim population. Absolute rubbish! The ready meal "scandal" was one of those stories which has just waiting to happen. Did nobody step back and wonder how the supermarkets had been generating such vast profits for so long? Did nobody stop to question the integrity of the food manufacturers whose profit margins were gradually being eroded by the greedy supermarkets?

A debate briefly surfaced a couple of weeks ago in which our Prime Minister insisted that we remain a Christian country. Since then, no less a figure than the Archbishop of Canterbury has added his voice to that of Mr. Cameron. As a church goer myself, I can only say that if this country is really still Christian, it manages to hide it admirably. That said, the Queen is still head of State and head of the church - the two long since having become quite unrelated. Can anyone claim that the UK is of this faith or that faith? That might have been possible before the wars but since then, we have embarked on a route of nihilism and hedonism.

Perhaps the real issue here is one of good old fashioned hypocrisy. It seems as though the uncompromising demands of faiths such as Islam are a little hard for us to accept. Perhaps if we followed suit and followed the faith which many of us continue to espouse (based on all recent census data), this would not even be an issue.

As far as I can recall though, the Christian tradition has seldom been a big consumer of meat anyway. Shrove Tuesday was the day when leftover bits of meat were consumed in a pancake with sweet things also being finished ahead of the fast of Lent. Meat was not consumed (Halal or otherwise) during Lent. Even when Good Friday arrived, Christians would eat fish, not meat. Jesus famously fed the five thousand with fish and loaves - no meat involved.

It's a great "story" for the Daily Mail and Nigel Farage but I'm not sure it's a story at all. Instead of going to a famous chain of restaurants to buy an over priced pizza, why not be radical and stay at home but make your own. That way, it will cost you a lot less with the added bonus that you will be master of what goes in it. The other day, we entertained a group of children aged between 6 and 9. Together, we made the pizza bases and the children made their own pizzas from base ingredients. We knew where every ingredient was from because we don't shop at the big supermarkets. Ergo, we didn't have to worry about any of the ingredients because we were able to buy them from small local independent retailers. For fear of sounding overly smug, it was a very satisfying experience. I don't know if my local butcher would know how to spell the word "halal", let alone define it. But he could tell me the name of the local farm whence our food came. You pay your money and you take your choice...

In 1943, Maslow espoused his now famous "hierarchy of needs". In it, he portrayed our human needs in a pyramid with the base representing our basic needs. These include breathing, food, water, sex, sleep, homeostasis and excretion. Nowhere does he specify our need to differentiate between our food and how it was prepared. If we are stranded in the desert on the verge of starvation, it's fair to say we will eat whatever we can find. Nothing has changed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We are what we eat?

As we continue to drown under a tsunami of over-regulation, I was horrified to read proposals to regulate the food industry like the tobacco industry.  There is a basic problem in this approach. Regulation only has a limited worth. We have seemingly regulated the way in which MPs claim their expenses. We have also aspired to regulate the banks in the wake of the credit crunch which so nearly brought this country to bankruptcy. The regulation of the tobacco industry is a cautionary tale of what happens when the state attempts to interfere with freedom of choice. For all the regulation and increased taxation, the incidence of new smokers taking up the habit has barely changed. The prevalence of people smoking as a proportion of the population has gradually dropped but not by nearly as much as originally intended. It proves that people will make their own minds up and make their own choices accordingly. The best way to effect a change at the end of the pipeline is to concentrate ou...

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Denbighshire: 28 days to stand up for the most vulnerable in our society!

This week, my local council has announced they are seeking the views of the public on how to minimise the impact of the cuts they have already decided. This request for our views has been rather poorly advertised but in spite of that, enough local people have successfully found where to air their views. By sharing that information with their friends and neighbours, the local council will hopefully receive the views of more people than they were perhaps expecting. Where do I start? Living in a modern democracy (as we are assured we do), I would have expected the council to first discuss the available options for cuts with the public through a proper consultation exercise. It is evident they have chosen not to do this. Instead, they have taken it upon themselves to decide who gets their funding taken away and who doesn't. Thus, it seems that our stated views will have little or no effect anyway. The council has already decided and in their eyes that is the end of the matter. The ...