Skip to main content

Denbighshire: The Challenge

In recent weeks, we have observed major shifts in international political direction as first Greece and then Spain have thrown their support behind radical left wing political parties. A brief glance at the history books suggests such a move to be far from novel. Following the austerity of the early 1930s, two major ideologies grew throughout Europe. The extreme right wing sought to take over Europe and, mercifully, failed. The extreme left wing existed beyond the symbolic wall in Berlin and it's influence exerted a vice-like grip across Eastern Europe. But when that wall was brought down in 1989, it ushered in the closing days of the far left in mainstream European politics. Until now.

Then as now, a sustained period of economic austerity has brought the political pendulum swinging back to the left. In the UK, it is surprising to observe the Labour Party floundering to express itself in the most fertile conditions for left wing politics imaginable. They have either lost their left wing credentials or elected a leader too far out of touch with real people. Of course, that same accusation could also be directed at the Tory party but nobody realistically expects a Tory leader to have had any appreciable life experience.

But what of the local picture? In Denbighshire, we are arguably confronted with a situation facing people all over the UK. Put simply, democracy is dysfunctional at a local level - irrespective of it's status at a national level.

In common with most other UK councils, my council in Denbighshire has been charged with trimming it's budget by roughly 10%. Given the obvious socio-economic implications of such a task, I would have thought "Maslow's hierarchy of needs" as good a starting point as any:-

http://www.businessballs.com/images/maslow's_hierarchy_businessballs.jpg

First espoused in the 1940s and 1950s in North America by Abraham Maslow, the famous pyramid is as relevant today as ever. Put simply, the bottom of the pyramid ascends in layers thus:-


  1. Physiological - a recognition of the absolute importance of our basic life needs such as air, food, drink, warmth, sex and sleep.
  2. Safety needs - protection, security, order, law, limits, stability etc.
  3. Belongingness and love needs - family, affection, work groups, relationships.
  4. Esteem needs - achievement, status, responsibility and reputation.
  5. Self-Actualisation - personal growth and fulfilment.
In the recent cuts put forward by Denbighshire County Council, it is as though they started cutting with the physiological needs and worked their way up from there. That displays an absolute ignorance of this widely acknowledged model and, worse still, an organisation totally out of touch with the public who pay the council tax which pays their wages.

So what exactly is the problem with Denbighshire County Council? To answer that question, we must first remind ourselves of the three players in this game. The players are Denbighshire County Council, the County Councillors and the public. By definition, there are three relationships:-

  • The relationship between the Council and the County Councillors.
  • The relationship between the County Councillors and the public.
  • The relationship between the Council and the public.
All three relationships are of paramount importance if the parties concerned are to even have a sniff of democracy. The extent to which the Council engages with the County Councillors is defined by how effectively the latter bring the former to account. But it is also defined by the extent to which the County Councillors engage with their public. Only then can they engage effectively with the Council. Without the stated views of the public, they are effectively an autonomous group principally representing their own interests and agendas. Of course, the majority of County Councillors are affiliated to various political groups. In principle, that is all well and good until we stop to realise that these political groups frequently order these County Councillors how to vote. That means that politically affiliated County Councillors will vote in a certain way based not on what their public have expressed but rather on what someone in their head office has told them to do. That is a far cry from democracy.

Thus far, I have found fault with the Council which can pretty much operate unchallenged and the County Councillors who are too often swayed by political directive rather than the views of the public they are paid to represent. That just leaves the public - you and I.

Are we blameless in any of this? No! For not engaging with our County Councillors and our Council, we must shoulder a large portion of the blame. It is insane that we merrily pay our council tax from month to month with little or no engagement with our County Councillors. But dare we wish for that third relationship; the relationship between the Council and the public? If we get involved in a more proactive way, we have every right to expect that relationship. The challenge is whether we want it badly enough. If we do, we could quite easily make Denbighshire the county which becomes the envy of every other in the UK. Is that fanciful? That depends on all of us; Council officers, County Concillors and the public. We pay our money and we take our choice.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...