Skip to main content

Bright future for NHS in Wales!

During the last few days of the referendum debates in Scotland, the subject of NHS funding inevitably and inexorably made it's way to the top of the agenda. It seems there are few subjects which can scare people more effectively than the NHS. In January, the Health Minister in the Welsh Assembly made a very important speech which was not afforded anything like the coverage it deserved. That is a great shame because for once, a senior Minister in the UK made a speech the content of which should be mandatory reading for everyone.

In seeking to promote a new era of "Prudent Health Care", Mark Drakeford reminded his audience that "each of us has a duty to look after our own health - we must all become custodians of our own health". This is no less than the reality. Access to the NHS has to have some strings attached before the whole system just collapses under the strain. 

"The NHS is free from charge but not free from obligation". If we all want it to remain free at the point of access true to the founding principles of Bevan, we have no choice but to recognise and accept our own obligations. It was a refreshing appraisal of the status quo. 

In his speech, Prof. Drakeford looked at health care both from the perspective of the individual and the whole population. He correctly proposes more of a joint effort between the patient and the healthcare professional. This will serve to promote a more concordant approach which is well known to yield more effective outcomes for the patient. It also has the added advantage of reducing waste with respect to both time and resources. When we go to our dentist, we sit there and the dentist tells us what we need to be doing better to have more healthy teeth. For reasons which are not always obvious, our visit to the doctor tends to begin with the doctor asking us what the problem is. The new approach being espoused by the Minister for Health urges us as patients and healthcare professionals to be more collaborative in seeking more effective solutions.  

The population has to play it's part by everyone accepting their responsibility for their own health. Prof. Drakeford is absolutely right even if achieving this is going to take time. Nothing will ever be achieved unless everyone knows where the goalposts are. It is going to take cultural change and that sort of change can take generations to achieve.

He is also right to point out that this strategy is not another case of "the Nanny State". By employing a more preventative approach and seeking to make healthcare interventions with the greatest chance of long term benefit, this approach simply seeks to avoid the higher, long term costs associated with avoidable ill health. 

Avoidable. That is the crucial word. He isn't talking about the unfortunate members of our society with problems beyond their control. He is just referring to the large numbers of people taking daily decisions which are known to exert negatively on their health - avoidable. This is why, among other things, he proposes a minimum 50p per unit charge for alcohol. This will exert a great benefit in a number of ways.

A minimum price for alcohol will reduce the existing chasm between supermarket and pub prices. The reason so many pubs have gone by the wayside is that they have been forced out of business by the loss leader strategies of the supermarkets. The reason this matters is that pubs were, and still should be, community hubs. The reason this is important is that the aspirations of the Health Minister will be dependent on a renewed community spirit. The effect of a 50p minimum price will be a bottle of wine for about £6.00 and a 4 pack of beer cans for £4.00. In other words, it wouldn't be dramatically different from the prices now but it would make the current playing field more level. More importantly, it would also serve to address the growing problem of alcohol addiction which continues to blight our society in Wales. It is admittedly very difficult to address those currently addicted but it is surely the least we can do to try and deter the next generation. 

The content of this speech needs to go viral like one of those funny videos we see on social media. If it does, there is every chance that our NHS will be able to continue true to the founding principles of Bevan. As the Minister said, "We must all become custodians of our own health".


Comments

  1. Smoking, drinking, over-eating, drugs, physical inactivity.
    These are the main causes off ill health at all ages. Those who indulge in them are not bothered. That is the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't entirely agree with you. I'm not aware of evidence which finds that people indulging in the main causes of ill health are just not bothered. Inside, I think we're all bothered. The difference is that some people appear to need a bit more time and attention to help them recognise the value of their health within the context of their lives. If I didn't believe this, it is arguable why we would have an NHS in the first place. Surely the aspiration of the NHS or any other healthcare system is to try their best to get people back on their feet not just for today but for the rest of their lives as well?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...