Skip to main content

Phil Mickelson: A legacy of the professional era

Although I have written before about the appalling legacy of the professional era, the post match press conference following the conclusion of the Ryder Cup was possibly the most unsavoury spectacle I have ever witnessed.

Sitting facing the world press were two representatives of the American team. The captain Tom Watson faced the ire of the American press with the major winner, Phil Mickelson. The verbal attack by Mickelson of his captain seated well within punching distance just beggared belief. It speaks volumes for the dignity of Tom Watson that he was able to just rise above it. Mickelson ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself. When the team has lost, it is the team who must stand up and be counted. When individuals start finger pointing, the finger ultimately closes in on themselves. This had shades of Kevin Pieterson. Mickelson epitomised all that is so wrong about players enough money to sustain the economy of a small African country. I can guarantee that no amateur player would ever have behaved so selfishly in the same circumstances. To think those thoughts is one thing - to utter them is unforgivable.  These were the words of a spoilt brat who still hasn't learned the oldest lesson in sport - how to be a good loser.

As for Tom Watson, he is one of the few people playing professional sport for whom I retain the utmost respect and admiration. Mickelson would do well to take a good hard look at Watson and then he would begin to realise exactly why it is that he commands such respect wherever he goes.

It was great day for European golf (aside from the banal ole, ole, ole drunk singing) but it was another black day for the professional sport CV. Roll on a return to the more seemly waters of the amateur tradition.

Comments

  1. During a modern era in sport when gloating and crotch grabbing are commonplace I've increasingly grown to admire the way an athlete accepts defeat. It's not easy. Certainly more difficult than rejoicing in victory.

    Ultimately, I think today's athletes should be humble. Earning amounts of money that at least 10 generations in future should still be enjoying. I was a lover of sport. But not anywhere near as much now as I used to be. For reasons similar to the one you share here.

    One day there will be none of us left who remember when it was commonplace (and expected) to display sportsmanship. Makes you wonder what all aspects of society will look like in 100 yrs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Extremely Worrying

Clearly worried about the recent levels of attention being paid to him, Richard Dawkins has just surpassed himself in an attempt to regain the spotlight. He has now turned his attention to fairy tales and warned of the danger of inflicting them on children because they “inculcate a view of the world which includes supernaturalism”. He urges us to promote a sense of scepticism in our children presumably so that they can become more like him. I was listening to a radio show yesterday in which a man phoned in to explain the difference between a doubting Thomas and a sceptic. A doubting Thomas will believe what you are saying if you can just show him an example for him to see with his own eyes whereas a sceptic is someone who still won’t believe you even when you have shown him. Dawkins sits firmly in the camp of the latter. For a seemingly educated man, his comments do him no credit. This is the same man whose considerable imagination has led to him proposing highly provocative theor...