Skip to main content

Phil Mickelson: A legacy of the professional era

Although I have written before about the appalling legacy of the professional era, the post match press conference following the conclusion of the Ryder Cup was possibly the most unsavoury spectacle I have ever witnessed.

Sitting facing the world press were two representatives of the American team. The captain Tom Watson faced the ire of the American press with the major winner, Phil Mickelson. The verbal attack by Mickelson of his captain seated well within punching distance just beggared belief. It speaks volumes for the dignity of Tom Watson that he was able to just rise above it. Mickelson ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself. When the team has lost, it is the team who must stand up and be counted. When individuals start finger pointing, the finger ultimately closes in on themselves. This had shades of Kevin Pieterson. Mickelson epitomised all that is so wrong about players enough money to sustain the economy of a small African country. I can guarantee that no amateur player would ever have behaved so selfishly in the same circumstances. To think those thoughts is one thing - to utter them is unforgivable.  These were the words of a spoilt brat who still hasn't learned the oldest lesson in sport - how to be a good loser.

As for Tom Watson, he is one of the few people playing professional sport for whom I retain the utmost respect and admiration. Mickelson would do well to take a good hard look at Watson and then he would begin to realise exactly why it is that he commands such respect wherever he goes.

It was great day for European golf (aside from the banal ole, ole, ole drunk singing) but it was another black day for the professional sport CV. Roll on a return to the more seemly waters of the amateur tradition.

Comments

  1. During a modern era in sport when gloating and crotch grabbing are commonplace I've increasingly grown to admire the way an athlete accepts defeat. It's not easy. Certainly more difficult than rejoicing in victory.

    Ultimately, I think today's athletes should be humble. Earning amounts of money that at least 10 generations in future should still be enjoying. I was a lover of sport. But not anywhere near as much now as I used to be. For reasons similar to the one you share here.

    One day there will be none of us left who remember when it was commonplace (and expected) to display sportsmanship. Makes you wonder what all aspects of society will look like in 100 yrs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Labour Leadership hopefuls thwarted by Socialist!

When Yvette Cooper today called for UK councils to each take a quota of Syrian refugees, it illustrated the pitfalls of political ambition. As is the custom for the modern breed of politician, she first went to Oxford to study politics, philosophy and economics in which she gained a first class honours degree. The daughter of the former leader of the Prospect union, she left Oxford to gain further qualifications at Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively. Then it was time to gain employment in the real world. Her first job in 1990 was as a policy researcher for the then Labour leader John Smith. By 1992, she had left these shores to help Bill Clinton with his presidential campaign. Any chances of real experience of the real world were dashed when she came back to become a policy advisor to Harriet Harman. This was followed by a role working as a research associate at the Centre for Economic Performance. By 1995, she had progressed to become Chief Economic Correspond...

Breaking the cycle

I have always been drawn to a good analogy. Recently, a very simple analogy was related to me which can be adapted to just about every walk of life. The analogy tells of a man standing on the banks of a river fishing dead bodies out as they float downstream. Another man comes along and instead walks upstream to try and find where they are coming from. Like all truly great analogies it is beautiful in its simplicity and easy to follow. I applied it in several contexts as I am sure you will already have done. In their wisdom (and if I was inclined to a mere slither of cynicism), the Welsh Government have once again sought to emulate their Scottish cousins by proposing a minimum pricing on alcohol. They claim that a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol might save the Welsh economy £1 billion annually. That is quite a claim. This is apparently based on research assessing crime, illness and workplace absence over the last 20 years. So why not just introduce this measure (no pun intend...

Public Engagement

What is the biggest difference between the Labour party of today and it's early incarnation under Keir Hardy? I think the answer to that question lies with all of us. It now astonishing to reflect upon the voter turnout for the General Election of 1950. A staggering 83.9% of the then electorate exercised their right to vote. That figure rose to 66.1% of the electorate at the last election. Why then have so many of us just opted out in the intervening years? Before answering that question, it is not all doom and gloom. The lowest turnout so far was in 2001 when a paltry 59.1% turned out to vote. That is all the more remarkable when we consider that the 1997 election which brought Tony Blair to power amassed an impressive 71.4%. That is quite a drop in just four years. But even that figure of 71.4% is pretty poor when compared to John Major's turnout of 77.7% in 1992. Either we are entering a new period of increased voter engagement or we have just witnessed a blip in the ove...