Skip to main content

Phil Mickelson: A legacy of the professional era

Although I have written before about the appalling legacy of the professional era, the post match press conference following the conclusion of the Ryder Cup was possibly the most unsavoury spectacle I have ever witnessed.

Sitting facing the world press were two representatives of the American team. The captain Tom Watson faced the ire of the American press with the major winner, Phil Mickelson. The verbal attack by Mickelson of his captain seated well within punching distance just beggared belief. It speaks volumes for the dignity of Tom Watson that he was able to just rise above it. Mickelson ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself. When the team has lost, it is the team who must stand up and be counted. When individuals start finger pointing, the finger ultimately closes in on themselves. This had shades of Kevin Pieterson. Mickelson epitomised all that is so wrong about players enough money to sustain the economy of a small African country. I can guarantee that no amateur player would ever have behaved so selfishly in the same circumstances. To think those thoughts is one thing - to utter them is unforgivable.  These were the words of a spoilt brat who still hasn't learned the oldest lesson in sport - how to be a good loser.

As for Tom Watson, he is one of the few people playing professional sport for whom I retain the utmost respect and admiration. Mickelson would do well to take a good hard look at Watson and then he would begin to realise exactly why it is that he commands such respect wherever he goes.

It was great day for European golf (aside from the banal ole, ole, ole drunk singing) but it was another black day for the professional sport CV. Roll on a return to the more seemly waters of the amateur tradition.

Comments

  1. During a modern era in sport when gloating and crotch grabbing are commonplace I've increasingly grown to admire the way an athlete accepts defeat. It's not easy. Certainly more difficult than rejoicing in victory.

    Ultimately, I think today's athletes should be humble. Earning amounts of money that at least 10 generations in future should still be enjoying. I was a lover of sport. But not anywhere near as much now as I used to be. For reasons similar to the one you share here.

    One day there will be none of us left who remember when it was commonplace (and expected) to display sportsmanship. Makes you wonder what all aspects of society will look like in 100 yrs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We are what we eat?

As we continue to drown under a tsunami of over-regulation, I was horrified to read proposals to regulate the food industry like the tobacco industry.  There is a basic problem in this approach. Regulation only has a limited worth. We have seemingly regulated the way in which MPs claim their expenses. We have also aspired to regulate the banks in the wake of the credit crunch which so nearly brought this country to bankruptcy. The regulation of the tobacco industry is a cautionary tale of what happens when the state attempts to interfere with freedom of choice. For all the regulation and increased taxation, the incidence of new smokers taking up the habit has barely changed. The prevalence of people smoking as a proportion of the population has gradually dropped but not by nearly as much as originally intended. It proves that people will make their own minds up and make their own choices accordingly. The best way to effect a change at the end of the pipeline is to concentrate ou...

Tony Blair - Not fade away?

Notwithstanding the current involvement of Gordon Brown in the current political debate surrounding the Scottish Referendum vote, it is customary for former prime ministers of the United Kingdom to fade gracefully in to the background and make way for the new breed. Margaret Thatcher, Edward Heath, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson all achieved this simple task without too much fuss. John Major occasionally interjects with an opinion but usually long after the boat has left the harbour. Tony Blair alone seems quite oblivious to this unspoken rule of British political life. An eleventh year leading the country was quite enough for Lady Thatcher when her party dispensed with her services. It seems that Tony Blair can't get enough of power. He is beginning to come across as one of those computer viruses which just won't go away once it has been granted access. We begin to rue the day we ever clicked the "yes" button. The virus invades our entire system and seems ubiquito...

Denbighshire: 28 days to stand up for the most vulnerable in our society!

This week, my local council has announced they are seeking the views of the public on how to minimise the impact of the cuts they have already decided. This request for our views has been rather poorly advertised but in spite of that, enough local people have successfully found where to air their views. By sharing that information with their friends and neighbours, the local council will hopefully receive the views of more people than they were perhaps expecting. Where do I start? Living in a modern democracy (as we are assured we do), I would have expected the council to first discuss the available options for cuts with the public through a proper consultation exercise. It is evident they have chosen not to do this. Instead, they have taken it upon themselves to decide who gets their funding taken away and who doesn't. Thus, it seems that our stated views will have little or no effect anyway. The council has already decided and in their eyes that is the end of the matter. The ...